This is a new feature for me, focusing on facets of data modeling, RDF, SPARQL, SHACL, and related semantic content,…
Kurt Cagle Explores the Cognitive Web
This is a new feature for me, focusing on facets of data modeling, RDF, SPARQL, SHACL, and related semantic content,…
I had a chance (finally) to read Dean Allemang’s recent article about the 2023 KGC Conference, Woolf at the Door:…
I gave this tutorial at the 2023 Knowledge Graph Conference at Cornell University. The tutorial included a demo showcasing how…
When people think about designing ontologies, they frequently leave one of the most powerful tools available to a modeler –…
In my last article (Why Prompts Are The Future of Knowledge Graphs), I explored why a prompt-based approach to knowledge…
Ontologists, especially neophyte data modelers, often get caught up in the definition of classes, wanting to treat everything as a class. However, there are two types of things that don’t actually fit cleanly into traditional distinctions of class: roles and categorizations. I’m not going to keep the focus of this article on roles, preferring to treat categorizations separately, though they have a lot of overlap.
This particular article is a discussion about a recommendation to a given standard, that of Sparql 1.1. None of this…
I am Kurt Cagle, or, according to my birth certificate, Kurt Alan Cagle. My name is Kurt Cagle.
Now, think about that for a bit. The to be verb is remarkably slippery, and it is slippery in almost every language on the planet that has such a construct.
You must be logged in to post a comment.